Monday, August 10, 2015

International Medical Ethics: Why is CANADA so far behind?



IN fact, many subsequent councils have advanced medical ethics, codes and guidelines.

Informed Consent for instance has been fleshed out in the following way in university research environments:

'Adults are assumed to be competent unless demonstrated otherwise.  Potential subjects should be adequately informed of the aims, methods, benefits, hazards and any discomfort.  Documentation given to potential subjects should be comprehensible.  Consent should normally be in writing and records kept. Potential subjects are free to withdraw without implication.  All subjects should be volunteers, decisions not to participate should not prejudice the subject in any way.'

One can see how far away the practice inside Canadian prisons is from what is internationally considered acceptable ethical standards.

Prisoners are not adequately informed of the aims, benefits (none), hazards (many), and discomfort (and the intent of informing someone of discomfort is to help assist them in making a decision to consent!).  Consent is not in writing, and no records are kept.  Subjects are NOT free to withdraw without implications or prejudice to their situation.   Instead they are routinely threatened when they object to imposed medical procedures including forced vaccinations.


Vaccines typically contain many harmful agents, making them effectively a 'noxious substance' and that means that administering such vaccines is a criminal offence.

Vaccines also includes aluminum, sodium chloride, L-histidine, polysorbate 80, water, and sodium borate – boric acid – (poison)! Boric acid, an insecticide and anti-fungal, is banned in the United States as a food additive. It is toxic to all cells. The negative effects of aluminum and other heavy metals are widely reported.

Vaccination: Side Effects, Risks, False Promises, Bad Science






Vaccine Information Vaccination: Basic Concerns

The medical establishment considers vaccines effective if they suppress a few targeted illnesses – but at what cost? An emerging body of evidence indicates that vaccines can damage a child’s developing brain and immune system, leading to neurodevelopmental disorders, learning disabilities, ADHD, asthma, anaphylactic food allergies, diabetes and autoimmune disorders. As well, vaccines have been linked to sudden, unexpected death in infancy and early childhood (SIDS).
Real Truth Behind Vaccines - Full HD Documentary https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M93CkKV6Mdw http://www.nvic.org/vaccines- Arguments for and against https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmjxuGIc06g
http://thinktwice.com/faq.htm


The Central Mechanism By Which Vaccines Induce Autism - Dr. Russell Blaylock Lecture https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmjxuGIc06g
Dr Russell Blaylock - Nutrition and the Illuminati Agenda
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dmjxuGIc06g
http://www.vaccinationcouncil.
CANADA
http://vaccinechoicecanada.
The International Medical Council on Vaccination is an association of medical doctors, registered nurses and other qualified medical professionals whose purpose is to counter the messages asserted by pharmaceutical companies, the government and medical agencies that vaccines are safe, effective and harmless.

Principles and Findings


  • We are profoundly critical of the practice of vaccination. Vaccination is an unacceptable risk to every member of society, regardless of age.
  • As medical professionals, Council members have observed first-hand the health of vaccinated vs. the unvaccinated. We find the latter group to be robust, healthy and drug-free compared to the former group.
  • We have reviewed published studies in support of vaccines and have found them wanting in both substance and science.
  • We have brought out into the open hundreds of peer-reviewed, published medical articles that document the damage and the diseases caused by vaccines.
  • We find the premise of herd immunity to be a faulty theory.
  • We encourage intelligent debate about vaccination.
  • We expect individuals to take responsibility for their health and the health of their children by investigating the problems due to vaccination prior to subjecting their children, or themselves, to this medical procedure.
  • We believe that refusing vaccination is a personal right that should be legislatively guaranteed.
http://www.drcarley.com/
Silent Epidemic; The Untold Story of Vaccines Movie dire
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
RESEARCH AND RESOURCES
http://vaccinechoicecanada.
http://www.vaccinationcouncil
http://www.collective-vaccine/
http://www.wellwithin1.com/
http://www.ssi.dk/English/Vaccines.aspx
INFO WARS
https://www.youtube.com/watch?
HERD IMMUNITY IS NOT LOGICAL https://www.youtube.com/watch?

Revelation 18:23 ...for by Mystery Babylon's sorceries (pharmakeia) were all nations deceived.

Forced Vaccination and the Nuremberg Code





 'The Nuremberg Code was delivered in 1947 as part of the verdict against Nazi doctors who had conducted horrific medical experiments on Jews and other prisoners and remains one of the foundations of medical ethics with respect to human subjects research. Some of the ten points of the code include the requirement for informed consent, the requirement that there be strong preclinical data (in vitro and animal experiments) to support the hypothesis being tested, that physical and mental suffering must be avoided or minimized, and several other principles that we accept today.'

a passage from an article entitled Have Rabbis Forgotten The Experiments on Jewish Women at Auschwitz?:
Needless to say, giving untested, unknown vaccines is a “medical experiment” and violates the core principles of the Nuremberg – informed and unambiguous consent. Forcing people to take vaccines, whether by a proclaimed “emergency,” by a “public health” order from the WHO, or by threat of loss of rights over one’s children or of imprisonment, removes consent, as does giving vaccines to those unable by age or mental status to legally consent. “Informed,” as well, is hollowed of all meaning when people are tricked into taking vaccines by the use of false or frightening “information.”

Medical Establishment Universally against Forced Vaccines

The American Medical Association, one of the largest and best medical groups in the world, condemns forced vaccination in clear and certain terms:


medical

American Medical Association opposes mandatory vaccines: medical ethics statement


(NaturalNews) According to the "Informed Consent" section of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics posted at the American Medical Association website, the AMA is fundamentally and unambiguously opposed to mandatory vaccine programs in America. Read the AMA's Code of Medical Ethics statement here.

A mandatory vaccination policy -- forced vaccination of unwilling recipients -- is, by definition, a medical intervention carried out without the consent of the patient or the patient's parents. This directly violates the very clear language in the Informed Consent section of the AMA Code of Medical Ethics which states:

The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment... Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor, unless the patient is unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting and harm from failure to treat is imminent.

"Physicians must honor" informed consent


The AMA's Code of Medical Ethics statement is very clear: "physicians must honor" the policy of informed consent. In fact, the AMA describes this as "a basic policy in both ethics and law" and only makes exception if the patient "is unconscious" or if harm from failure to treat "is imminent."

Mandatory vaccine interventions are conducted in total violation of this code of ethics. Most unvaccinated children are in a state of perfect health, with no symptoms and no active disease. There is no "imminent" risk of harm from "failure to treat."

Because the mainstream media is desperately trying to confuse the public about the very definition of "medical consent," here is the Dictionary.com definition of "consent":

verb - to permit, approve, or agree; comply or yield (often followed by to or an infinitive)
He consented to the proposal. We asked her permission, and she consented.

Patients deserve an "informed choice"

The AMA's Code of Ethics statement furthermore says that patients possess a "right of self-decision" and that this right can only be effectively exercised "if the patient possesses enough information to enable an informed choice."

Nearly all vaccinations are carried out in direct violation of this medical code of ethics because patients are almost never handed vaccine insert sheets, and the very real risks of vaccination are almost never explained to anyone. In fact, virtually the entire medical establishment operates in a state of total denial that any vaccine risks exist at all. This, too, is a striking violation of the AMA's code of ethics.

It is also an outright abandonment of all logic and medical reality, as every medical intervention comes with some level of risk, even if that risk is small. It is not zero, as is routinely and repeatedly claimed by vaccine fanatics.

Doctors should "respectfully" explain treatment options to patients

The AMA's Code of Ethics further states "Physicians should sensitively and respectfully disclose all relevant medical information to patients."

Instead, what we actually see in America today is:

• Belligerent doctors verbally berating patients for asking intelligent, informed questions about vaccine ingredients and vaccine side effects.

• Arrogant doctors threatening to cut off all medical treatment from patients unless they agree to a coerced medical intervention (vaccinations).

• Doctors and hospitals calling law enforcement authorities on families, then staging the state seizure of children while threatening parents with arrest and imprisonment (medical kidnapping).

These actions are so far removed from the AMA's Code of Ethics that they call into question the very real question of whether the entire medical system has utterly abandoned any shred of medical ethics at all.

A campaign of intellectual bigotry carried out in the name of science

Today, medical obedience to mandatory vaccines is being aggressively demanded by rage-filled doctors, health authorities and media outlets. A vicious campaign of intellectual bigotry has been unleashed against all vaccine skeptics, with malicious tactics such as equating skeptical thinkers who seek to avoid mercury with people who still think the Earth is flat.

There is no question that such malicious tactics against concerned moms are being conducted in total violation of the AMA's own Code of Ethics, which also states that "The physician's obligation is to present the medical facts accurately to the patient or to the individual responsible for the patient's care and to make recommendations for management in accordance with good medical practice."

This code of medical ethics means doctors may educate patients and even respectfully urge them to follow a particular course of action, but they may not coerce, threaten, intimidate or otherwise verbally berate patients who disagree with their suggested course of action.

Here's the full statement from the AMA's Code of Ethics page, section 8.08 - Informed Consent:

The patient's right of self-decision can be effectively exercised only if the patient possesses enough information to enable an informed choice. The patient should make his or her own determination about treatment. The physician's obligation is to present the medical facts accurately to the patient or to the individual responsible for the patient's care and to make recommendations for management in accordance with good medical practice. The physician has an ethical obligation to help the patient make choices from among the therapeutic alternatives consistent with good medical practice. Informed consent is a basic policy in both ethics and law that physicians must honor, unless the patient is unconscious or otherwise incapable of consenting and harm from failure to treat is imminent. In special circumstances, it may be appropriate to postpone disclosure of information, (see Opinion E-8.122, "Withholding Information from Patients").

Physicians should sensitively and respectfully disclose all relevant medical information to patients. The quantity and specificity of this information should be tailored to meet the preferences and needs of individual patients. Physicians need not communicate all information at one time, but should assess the amount of information that patients are capable of receiving at a given time and present the remainder when appropriate. (I, II, V, VIII)


Because we believe the AMA will, after seeing this investigative story, attempt to alter or revoke this medical ethics document, we are also posting a screen shot of the AMA's page sourced on February 9, 2015:
 
 

Class Action Suit against the Government of Canada




This website will be a central information and exchange center for the issue of the current deplorable conditions in Canadian prisons, one aspect of which is the forced vaccination of inmates and detainees with substances of dubious medical value.

This action by the government constitutes an extreme violation of the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

It also violates the Criminal Code of Canada, including, but not limited to,
the following:

(1) Forced medical treatment without consent.  A violation of basic rights and freedoms.  The right to refusal of medical treatment is a natural and international right, recognized for all human beings.

(2) The administering of a noxious substance.  Vaccines contain a variety of poisonous, harmful, and noxious substances, including carriers and non-medicinal ingredients that are of dubious value but are known to be harmful biological agents.

(3) Assault, and assault bodily harm.  The forced injection of harmful chemical agents is a form of assault, which can result in horrific medical illnesses and complications.

(4)  Assault with a weapon, aggravated assault.  The needle used, and the forced confinement often used, is in fact assault with a weapon.  If for instance, any ordinary citizen stabbed a police officer or government employee with a needle containing ambiguous substances, that citizen would be instantly charged with assault with a weapon, and the basic question of assault with a weapon would not be in dispute.

(5)  Cruel and Unusual Punishment.  The emotional and psychological stress caused by forced injections on unwilling and uninformed detainees constitutes a violation of both the Charter of Rights and international law.

(6)  The provision of a means or system to harm inmates.  This system can be abused and has been already abused in a number of ways, including the injection of harmful substances without the knowledge of inmates or even medical practitioners.  It constitutes the creation of a second 'tier' system of punishment upon inmates not authorized by either the Criminal Code or the Charter of Rights.